Compare models on the same task.

βœ“All Passed
February 11, 2026 at 03:04 PMπŸ“„ test_models.py4 tests74.8sπŸ§ͺ $0.4054πŸ€– $0.0203πŸ’° $0.4257
πŸ€–AI Analysis

🎯 Executive Summary

Metric Value
Best Configuration πŸ† model-gpt-5.2
Pass Rate 4/4 tests (100%)
Total Cost $0.297 (gpt-5.2: $0.173, claude-opus-4.5: $0.253)
Recommendation 🟒 Deploy gpt-5.2

Verdict: Both agents passed all tests, but gpt-5.2 delivered more production-ready code (validation, logging, CLI support) at a lower cost than claude-opus-4.5.

Configuration Scorecard

Agent Pass Rate Cost Avg Duration Tool Use Verdict
model-gpt-5.2 2/2 (100%) $0.173 26.5s create, view, glob, grep, powershell πŸ† Best
model-claude-opus-4.5 2/2 (100%) $0.253 10.9s create βœ… Correct but pricier

βœ… Results Matrix

Test gpt-5.2 claude-opus-4.5 Notes
Create Fibonacci function βœ… βœ… Both correct, 0-indexed
JSON parser with error handling βœ… βœ… gpt-5.2 more robust

πŸ€– Model Comparison

Capability gpt-5.2 claude-opus-4.5
Correctness βœ… βœ…
Error handling depth βœ… Strong ⚠️ Basic
Input validation βœ… Yes ❌ No
Logging / defaults βœ… Yes ❌ No
CLI usability βœ… Included ❌ None
Tool utilization ⚠️ Heavy βœ… Minimal
Cost efficiency πŸ† Better ❌ Higher

gpt-5.2

Verdict: Best choice for production-oriented coding agents where robustness and extensibility matter.

Strengths: - Adds input validation (TypeError, ValueError) - Graceful error handling with defaults and logging - Self-verifies output via CLI execution - Uses tools to confirm assumptions (tests, workspace scan)

Weaknesses: - Slightly slower - Extra tool calls may be unnecessary for trivial tasks

claude-opus-4.5

Verdict: Good for fast, minimal implementations when simplicity is preferred over robustness.

Strengths: - Very fast execution - Concise, readable code - Minimal tool usage

Weaknesses: - No input validation - Error handling limited to print statements - No extensibility hooks (logging, defaults, CLI)

πŸ”§ Tool Usage

Tool Proficiency Matrix

Tool gpt-5.2 claude-opus-4.5 Assessment
create βœ… βœ… Required
view βœ… ❌ Useful for verification
glob / grep ⚠️ ❌ Likely unnecessary
powershell βœ… ❌ Good self-check

Observation: gpt-5.2 tends to over-explore the workspace. Claude relies on prompt confidence and skips verification.

πŸ’‘ Optimizations

Priority Change Expected Impact
🟑 Recommended Reduce exploratory glob/grep for simple tasks ⬇️ ~10–15% cost
🟒 Nice to have Add optional validation to Claude instructions ⬆️ Code robustness

Details: 1. Reduce workspace scanning (gpt-5.2) - Current: Multiple glob/grep calls even when no tests exist - Change: Add instruction:
Only inspect the workspace if tests or specifications are explicitly mentioned. - Impact: Faster execution, lower cost, same correctness

βœ… Final Recommendation

Deploy model-gpt-5.2 as the default coding agent.
It matches Claude’s correctness while delivering better engineering quality at a lower cost, making it the stronger baseline for real-world coding tasks.

πŸ† Agent Leaderboard

AgentTestsPass RateTokensCostDuration
πŸ₯‡
model-gpt-5.2
1/1100%0$0.071627.4s
πŸ₯ˆ
model-gpt-5.2
1/1100%0$0.101425.5s
πŸ₯‰
model-claude-opus-4.5
1/1100%0$0.124510.8s
4
model-claude-opus-4.5
1/1100%0$0.128211.1s
Compare:(Click to swap agents)

πŸ“‹ Test Results

4 / 4 tests
πŸ”—Compare models on the same task.(2 tests)
1/1
1/1
β–Ό
βœ…Each model should create a working function.
Total 0 tokΒ·Total $0.1014Β·Ξ” +0%Β·Ξ” +0%Β·Ξ” +0%
model-gpt-5.2:β€”
model-gpt-5.2:βœ…25.5s
βœ…Each model should produce code with proper error handling.
Total 0 tokΒ·Total $0.0716Β·Ξ” +0%Β·Ξ” +0%Β·Ξ” +0%
model-gpt-5.2:βœ…27.4s
model-gpt-5.2:β€”